Thursday, 28 April 2016

Star Wars Rogue 0.9: The Importance of Good Coffee



"Faith" is a really good, smooth, nutty, tasty Columbian coffee blend. It is served at a café near Charing Cross in Glasgow.

Darth Vader likes to go to that café to grab a takeaway cup on his way into the office for important Death Star project management meetings. He puts up with all the hipster shite. The coffee really is that good.

Today they are meeting at the offices of one of the legal services providers used by the Empire on Blytheswood Square.

Some of his colleagues go to different cafés: Darth Vader walks in to the city centre office from his flat just off Woodlands Road in the West End, while some of his colleagues who live on the Southside walk up from Central Station in the morning and so pass a different café on their way in to work.

It turns out one of those other cafés only serves instant coffee.

Wednesday, 27 April 2016

The Fault Line


The fault line is where we apportion blame, and where earthquakes happen when we do this right.
  • The police whose criminal derelictions left 96 dead. 
  • The press that denigrated the dead with the most humiliating and degrading calumny. 
  • The authorities that persevered with a scandalous cover up for decades, fruadulently altering and redacting statements, strenuously repeating lies under oath to preserve the reputations of the criminally negligent. 
  • The politicians who dismissed and insulted the victims' families and communities just as casually and unquestioningly as they automatically close ranks to protect any establishment figures incriminated by events.
Hillsborough exposes a fault line that runs right through British society. 

This fault line divides those people the police, press and politicians all blamed for what happened at Hillsborough and those people who the inquest has finally stated were really at fault. 

But it doesn't end there. 
  • This fault line runs between the haves and the have-nots.
  • This fault line runs between those who speak up and those who shout down.  
  • It runs between the whistle-blowers and the piss-takers. 
  • It runs between affluent, influential, well-connected liars who consider themselves beholden to no-one, and honest, hard working communities who invest and express their loyalty in a shared experience of the victories and defeats of their local football club every Saturday.
  • It runs between bankers and businessmen whose every word the media believes and repeats as though their greed and cupidity conferred some genuine expertise and authority, no matter how many economies they crash, no matter how many crises they cause, and the real "wealth creators," the people who rely on real enterprise just to put food on the table, the people whose effort and invention is devalued to pay for the lifestyles of others
  • It runs between victims of systematic paedophile abuse who have been silenced and ignored for decades and the authorities and establishment that conspire to hide and protect their powerful abusers. 
  • It runs between arms dealers at trade fairs in London making fortunes buying and selling bombs and the thousands of child refugees who flee those bombs only to be turned away at our border. 
  • It runs between an NHS whose workers are struggling to preserve a service true to its founding ideals and principles, and a government eager to undermine it to contrive public dissatisfaction that will ease its eventual sale to their cronies. 
  • It runs between every scape goat we accuse and everybody whose guilt is denied as a result.
  • It runs along and through the trenches at the Somme, dividing the indifferent aristocrats safe behind the lines and the poor bloody infantry slaughtered at the front.
  • The same line runs along the terraces as the trenches. The fault line is the front line where we die of official indifference.
  • It runs between the way things are and the way they should be.
  • It runs between the future and the past. 
History moves at a glacial pace. Public opinions and attitudes do follow a certain logic, but it is one that moves in mysterious ways, and takes generations to unfold. But sometimes there are events that change things. Sometimes a set of circumstances can  arise that precipitates an adjustment. 

A moment of social and political tectonics occurred in Warrington today. But this is about more than one day in Warrington or another day in Sheffield. This is about all of us. The ground shifted. The fault line was exposed. And the tremors radiated out across the entire country. 

Justice will only be served when the whole rotten edifice that has obstructed the simple search for truth for decades - and continues to obstruct the truth on other issues to serve other clandestine interests - is brought crashing down as a consequence. 

Monday, 25 April 2016

It's a trap!

The future of Scottish shipyard workers remains in doubt. These are jobs that a No vote in the 2014 Independence referendum was supposed to guarantee. That turns out not to have been true, like a variety of other undertakings made in the unionist's 11th hour "vow" and other promises (to the limited extent that these utterances have any substance or coherence once the media scaffold that propped them up is removed).

The Labour Party in Scotland are catching a certain amount of flak about this. After all, it was Labour politicians and officials from Labour-affiliated unions that dutifully repeated Project Fear's apocalyptic prognostications about the consequences for ship building jobs if the electorate failed to vote No. Now threats to these totemic Clyde-built jobs linger nevertheless.

We see breath-taking feats of hypocrisy as Labour claim it is "insensitive" to discuss politics when livelihoods are at stake. As I have repeatedly said, Labour's salvation in Scotland lies in humility, in admitting they were wrong and working on longer term post-Independence credibility. Instead they seem intent on doubling down on every folly. It is as if they had crashed a car and then claimed criticism of their driving was somehow insensitive to their victims. Where humility is required we are subjected instead to their cynical faux outrage and knee-jerk pleas of victim-hood

This comes at a bad time for Labour. The coop is getting crowded with chickens coming home to roost. Labour-backed PFI deals have been exposed to scrutiny by their nightmare consequences. We have seen their leader perform policy pirouettes on key issues as she has made a series of U-turns on the hoof in rapid succession.

The worst thing that could happen would be open discord among the ranks, especially immediately before an election. It is axiomatic that disunity is fatal to a party's electoral fortunes. Yet we see persistent speculation about a leadership contest, and it seems the real reason the leader persists with her policy pirouettes is because she can't afford to leave her back turned towards her internal rivals for any length of time. One can imagine scientists at LIGO detecting gravitational waves as the rapidly spinning super-massive egos at the heart of Scottish Labour spiral towards each other and collide, destroying each other and the party in the process.

The causes of Labour's troubles in Scotland are manifold.

Over the long term they find themselves defending an obsolete constitutional arrangement whose relevance only ever lay in subordinating Scottish labour, capital and raw materials to an imperial endeavour that is now long abandoned. As a consequence they have acquiesced to a post-imperial role in which they manage industrial decline and soothe discontent with nostalgia while their threadbare hand-me-down credentials are exposed to the point of disintegration.

Over the mid-term they find themselves embedded in structures that pit them against a Tory administration at Westminster while trying to defend the powers that very same administration wields in Scotland, lacerating themselves with cognitive dissonance and the extravagance of their self-contradictions.

But most recently, they continue to find themselves being punished for walking shoulder to shoulder with the Tories during the referendum campaign.

The Tory controlled UK Government will happily allow Scottish jobs to remain in jeopardy if it damages Labour. They only care about destroying their opposition at Westminster. They explicitly don't care about Scotland: as David Cameron is reported to have said to Nick Clegg in relation to the referendum "Look Nick, I just don’t care. We've only got one Conservative MP north of the Border. Let Labour sort it out. It’s now their problem." The Labour Party in Scotland are the defenders of a union whose own officers hold Scotland in contempt.

Labour in Scotland have allowed themselves to be stitched up and hung out to dry by the Tories. Better Together will prove as toxic to Labour as coalition proved to be for the Lib-Dems.

The tragedy is that this was all so predictable. The moment they found common cause with Cameron - a Machiavellian psychopath trained in disdain from birth at the best bully-schools to which money and privilege grant access, spoiled and brutalised by cash and casual cruelty and Bullingdon debauch, and initiated into class warfare by inter-generational oligarchs through fornication with a dead pig's head - they placed their fate in the hands of their mortal enemy.

Cameron always knew that Labour could not stand shoulder to shoulder with him without shouldering the blame afterwards. After all, who is more at fault, the devil or the dolt who opens the door to him. Cameron had nothing to lose and therefore everything to gain and in Labour he found his accomplices. How can Labour in Scotland ever be trusted when they blundered so willingly into such an obvious trap?

Ararat


Ararat may still be far off
and our ark may have run aground
but remain cheerful. We will attain The Summit. 

The next tide will surely lift the boat off the rocks,
and we will reach The Summit we see from The Square. 

Remain cheerful and prepare for the day. 
Do not try to hasten it. It will come. 
Do not act as though it's here already. 

Prepare. A Friday in April 1992.
We gathered in The Square. We felt it sway
with the spontaneous surge of people
pouring in from all directions.
We thought the flood was here already, 
and for one day revolution seemed possible,
but on Saturday we looked to the platform we set up
and saw gathering round the helm preening pilots 
for whom that deck was just a stage
to perform their self-importance on, 
an end in itself, careerist charlatans
who only steer towards the summit of their ambition. 
Analysis was offered where action was needed,
and directionless, the moment passed,
and the movement ran aground once more, 

but nothing was a waste of effort
not matter how it felt at the time.  
Even our frustrations prepare us.

Forty unforgettable days in 2014. 
Giddy, glorious, exhilarating summer days.
We gathered in The Square with the dawn,
flooding in with the rising of the sun each day
and dispersing at night in good humour,
and felt the waters lift the boat once more,
the keel teeter as our blue banners fluttered,
and its bulk shift, thrillingly, enthrallingly, 
irrevocably in our waves of blue and white,
but though the ship nearly slipped off the shoal
it stopped just short of Freedom, 

and some now despair as the waters recede
and strand us in swirling chaos once again, 
surrounded by fathoms not of our choosing,
and treacherous eddies of withdrawing water.

But do not try to haul us off the rocks!
The undamaged hull is swiftest in the water,
and we will need her intact once she is free.

Remain cheerful! Attend to your tasks. 
Refine your skills. Rehearse your part. 
Prepare,

for we will advance a third time
and gather in The Square, and look upon The Summit,
and that tide will surely lift the boat from the rocks,
and all our preparations will ensure a swift safe course
to the brighter slopes of our new Ararat.


(Written in response to perceived frustration, impatience and disunity in the Scottish Independence movement)


Sunday, 17 April 2016

They privatised my kidneys



They privatised my kidneys
which means I owe them piss.
They came to take my colon,
well they can take jack shit.
They patented my genome
so they won't be surprised
when I turn all green and angry
and tear down their franchise.
The revolution's coming. 
I feel it in my bones. 
I reach inside where they can't reach
and pull out ancient stones.
The graves of famous soldiers
and soldiers still unknown
will be the altar where their brains
are dashed out with those stones.
Let's shed a little sunlight 
on the wisdom from that font. 
Let's see the genius insight
that knows why fear and want
is borne by the many 
so the few can act like cunts.
Let's reconstruct the thought process
that thinks that that's alright
in laboratory conditions.
We'll find it's a freakish sight. 
The revolution's coming:
the whisper in the gutter, 
the fear around the corner, 
the truth they dare not utter.
They privatised my kidneys. 
Their gurus said it's smart. 
They'll find it's not as easy
to privatise my heart. 

The light


They say
a light shines in the darkness 
which the dark can't comprehend

They say 
she lived her life
like a candle in the wind

They say
life's but a walking shadow
until that brief candle is put out

And all the time the suggestion is  
we are all lights
divided by an abyss of darkness perhaps,
occasionally visible to each other,
but otherwise alone and lost,

But they are wrong.
There is no darkness, only light,
everywhere and always,
light.
There are closed eyes, 
that open twice, 
at the beginning and the end of life;
and in between there is a dream
when we imagine we can turn away
from what is already within us. 

Thursday, 14 April 2016

The writing on the wall


מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין
("Mene, mene, tekel, parsin.") 
Monetary units corresponding to menas, shekels, and half measures.

"God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it. Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting."
The interpretation of the writing on the wall given in Daniel 5:26-27

"Now Tobiah the Ammonite was by him, and he said, Even that which they build, if a fox go up, he shall even break down their stone wall."
Nehemiah 4:3

In January hundreds of bricks were blown from the walls of Oxgangs Primary School in Edinburgh. Since then 17 schools in Edinburgh have been closed due to issues arising from poor construction.

PFI/PPP (Private Finance Initiative/Public Private Partnership), the approach to capital investment in infrastructure in Scotland, adopted, since the Major government, by the Tories and Labour prior to devolution, and subsequently by Labour/Lib Dem coalition administrations at Holyrood, has come under scrutiny because of these catastrophic failures of projects funded using this approach, such as where parts of schools have collapsed.

This has been widely reported. While the mainstream media (MSM) have certainly been protecting the Labour Party in Scotland from potential adverse political consequences in their reporting of these events, Labour's responsibility for the funding mechanism associated with these projects has been commented on extensively in social media.

As Jack McConnell said in 2002, while First Minister of Scotland: "Let's be clear. We set the standards. We demand the quality and PPPs don't just attract finance; they make sure private contractors deliver hospitals and schools for our communities - on time, within budget, well designed and easily maintained". Labour in Scotland explicitly took responsibility at the time in order to allay concerns about the impact the way the deals were structured may have on project outcomes. Therefore they must take responsibility now.

If we set allocation of blame and political point scoring to one side for a moment, however, can we identify exactly what was wrong with the deals, what can be done to avoid this in the future, and how things can be done better than they currently are? As I see it, there are two issues:

  1. Structuring the deals to make sure outcomes are aligned with objectives and the failings described above are avoided, and 
  2. Financing them in the most efficient way possible: the way that makes sure public money ends up being as much bricks and mortar and as little unproductive private profit as possible.  

The problems with PFI projects historically, that have resulted in sub-standard construction and technical project failure, appear to originate in a fairly basic conflict of interests in the way the PFI deals were structured. The lenders who provided the finance for the projects in many instances retained an equity stake in the assets. That is, once everything is all paid up, those that provided the funds in the first place still own the buildings. In addition they often hold maintenance contracts.

This means that rather than the borrower being the client who instructs the builders and specifies the deliverable, the lender takes control. But the lender has no responsibility to deliver the services for which the assets are required. Of course, the lender must ensure that the debt can be repaid with interest. However, the lender is not competent to determine the project costs for which the debt is incurred because the lender is not required to use the buildings to provide the intended educational or other services. As a result, costs are cut inappropriately resulting in projects that are not fit for purpose.

It should be emphasised that the parties to the deal are all acting as would be expected under the circumstances, pursuing their own interests to the extent allowed by the deal in a perfectly legal and appropriate manner. The problem arises because the structure of the deal itself fails to align this with the objectives of the project. In particular, a conflict of interest arises when one party holds both debt and equity positions in the same project.

The Scottish Futures Trust (SFT), following the NPD (Non Profit Distributing) model which was developed to replace PFI by the SNP administration that took office in 2007, avoids these pitfalls, with strict separation of debt and equity for projects and clarity that the builder's client is the end user so that  projects are specified and delivered accordingly. However, the issue of the most efficient way of raising finance remains.

This is the difficult part, because the Scottish Government has limited room for manoeuvre. Currently it is still constrained by fiscal requirements and limits imposed by the UK Government. So, for example, it is limited in the extent to which it can borrow and issue bonds, and runs its deficit as part of the overall UK deficit, subject to the priorities of the Treasury. Therefore it remains to some extent hostage to the failed Westminster austerity agenda and cannot optimise its approach unconstrained.

The Unionist resolution of this would be to install a more rational government at Westminster that adopts fiscal policies more conducive to sensible financing of capital investment in infrastructure in Scotland. The Nationalist solution would be to provide the Scottish Government with the free hand it needs via Independence. The Unionist objection to this would be to claim that UK Government bonds will be rated more favourably than Scottish Government bonds, resulting in lower costs of borrowing and higher financial efficiency. The Nationalist would respond that this hypothetical situation is really an indictment of the state of the economy bequeathed to an Independent Scotland by the UK, and that one cannot argue simultaneously that everything changes (politically) and nothing changes (economically). We could start the Indyref 2 debate right here.

One question remains to my mind though. Since November 2009 the Bank of England has purchased £375 million of UK Government debt by creating new money in a process called Quantitative Easing (QE). The European Central Bank has a similar €60 billion per month bond buying programme. The purpose of QE is to meet monetary targets: to control interest and inflation rates. What if it was also used as an instrument of fiscal policy?

We would have to adopt a more agile approach to both monetary and fiscal policy, evaluating actions in a more sophisticated way, rather than the current one-dimensional thinking, and considering central banks and governments to be interdependent on rather than independent of each other.  However, what is better: allowing new money to exist only as debt whose disposition is governed only by monetary considerations; or letting that money represent real value, real bricks and mortar, being put to genuine use delivering education and health services for the people whose taxes ultimately end up servicing the debt the bonds represent?

Wednesday, 13 April 2016

An Linn an Òir



Ann an Linn an Òir
bha an t-isean òg
na bhalach àlainn bàn,
le falt airgead
a' cluich le dèideag umha.
Cha dèan duine feum
de làmh iarrain
no sùil throm
no cridhe cloich
ann an Linn an Òir.

In the Golden Age
the youngest child 
was a beautiful fair-haired boy, 
with silver hair.
playing with a toy of bronze.
No-one will make use 
of a hand of iron, 
an eye weary of seeing, 
or a heart of stone 
in the Golden Age

(Revised after receiving invaluable feedback from Angus Peter Campbell who I asked to help me address my blas na Beurla)

Tuesday, 12 April 2016

Rain falls and stars rise


Just as each rain drop is not lost,
but becomes part of the pool
without which ripples are not possible,

and just as the summer sun, crystallised
in the brittle bronze leaves of autumn
succumbs at last to gravity,
falls,  
and is swept into the fire
that releases its captive light,
and its substance disperses in the form of billowing smoke,
briefly illuminated by the conflagration,
before receding into the darkness of the lengthening night
where the cold is bright with the astronomies of winter,

and as every failure at the tables merges with the calculus of odds,
all futilities fusing together in the grand aggregation of outcomes,
and every ruin foundation to some success,

so as we progress from the clarity of strident youth,
through maturity and years of service to love in all its forms,
to the confusion and yearning of perplexed old age,
and eventually yield to the final absence and entropy
that waits to claim us,

we are not lost

but become one at last with an infinite night, 
studded with ten hundred thousand stars
becoming at once nothing
and more than we can ever imagine.

Darcy v Rochester

Pride and Prejudice is a great book/movie/TV series. On a rainy weekend afternoon, it's great to curl up on the couch and escape into the fantasy world of a perfect period drama.

But as a man, I prefer Jane Eyre.

Why? Let's compare the characters of Darcy and Rochester point by point.

Matrimony


  • After overcoming the various difficulties comprising the plot, Darcy finally marries Elizabeth.
  • An objection is raised when Rochester attempts to marry Jane, and Rochester ends up in a fight. 


Previous girlfriends


  • Darcy seems to have had little interest in women before Elizabeth Bennet entered his world. 
  • Rochester's ex is a psycho bitch.


Property


  • Elizabeth likes Darcy's "beautiful grounds at Pemberley" which finally persuade her she loves him.
  • Rochester's Thornfield burns to the ground. 


Morality


  • Darcy conducts himself with the utmost propriety and intervenes to prevent Lydia's disgrace.
  • Rochester is a thwarted bigamist. 


Money


  • The Bennet girls marry into money. Darcy (and his friend Bingley) are impossibly rich. 
  • Jane Eyre inherits her uncle's fortune and is therefore independently wealthy. 


Physical attraction


  • Darcy is handsome and playing him grants an actor "sex symbol" status.
  • Rochester: “Am I hideous, Jane?" "Very, sir: you always were, you know."


Fairy tale endings


  • Darcy and Elizabeth live happily ever after.
  • Rochester is blinded and loses a hand as Thornfield burns down and his first wife kills herself. 


So, as a man, I consider Rochester a much more interesting and realistic character, while Darcy is an oppressive ideal.

Thursday, 7 April 2016

Air an t-seachdamh latha / on the seventh day



Air an t-seachdamh latha
gu ear air Gàrradh Edein
lorgidh sinn iad:

na craobhan eile,
sgeadaichte le sgrath nathrach's
aodaichte le neòil.

Tha cothrom uile
air ùbhlan dearmaid seachad
air an t-seachdamh latha

On the seventh day
east of Eden
we will find them:

the other trees, 
adorned with the slough of snakes
and clothed with clouds.

All opportunities
to eat their apples of unknowing have past
on the seventh day

Wednesday, 6 April 2016

When a lightbulb is brighter than a star


"Far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined it"
Richard Feynman

"Here comes the science bit"
Jennifer Aniston

Recently the Brooklyn based artist Rob MacInnis set up a camera near a hill and took an LED light bulb up the hill to a location near the top whose distance from the camera was far enough for the light bulb to be the same size as a star.

This is shown in this video he took with the camera which is found on his website here:
http://www.robmacinnis.com/the-brightest-star-in-the-night-sky/

The angular extent of the light bulb is the same as the star Alpha Centauri. But what can be seen clearly in the video is that the light bulb appears brighter than the star. The difference in the physical size of the light bulb and star should have been compensated by the difference in the distances that results in them both covering the same amount of the sky.  

So how can the light bulb be brighter than a star under these circumstances?

The answer is to consider the different ways they make light.

The star radiates energy over a broad spectrum of electromagnetic frequencies. This includes the visible spectrum we can see, but the star is also "radio bright", emits infra-red, ultraviolet, and so on. The variation in intensity over this spectrum is related to the star's temperature and the thermodynamic equilibrium between the electromagnetic radiation it emits and the star's photosphere, heated by nuclear fusion reactions within its core.

If the Sun was a different temperature, the relative brightness of the colours in a rainbow would be different because the spectrum would be different. The peak in the Sun's spectrum - the brightest colour in the rainbow - is bluey-green. The Sun appears yellow because of our colour perception of combinations of multiple frequencies of light. A shift in this peak as a result of a change in temperature would result in a different perceived colour.  

The LED light bulb concentrates its emissions into a much narrower range of frequencies, almost entirely within the visible spectrum. The frequency of the LED emissions is completely determined by the difference in energy between valence and conduction bands in the semiconductor material from which the LED is made.

The light bulb appears white because it contains a single blue LED coated with phosphor which absorbs and re-emits the light produced by the LED over a slightly broader spectrum of frequencies. But, unlike the star, temperature does not affect the colour of the LED. The populations of electrons in the conduction and valence energy bands may change with temperature, but the energy gap between them does not. The rate at which electrons change energy levels in the phosphor may change with temperature, but the energies associated with those levels do not.

The star is bright because it is hot. The LED is bright despite being cold.

Imagine, instead, you had a hypothetical star made entirely of LED light bulb stuff, to compare directly with a similarly sized star made of typical star stuff. You can hold an LED light bulb in your hand. It would be difficult to scoop up a handful of star to do the same thing.

The LED star would be brighter but colder. If we had to plot the LED light bulb star on a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, it would be an extreme outlier.

Why is this important?

An instructive contrast would be to consider a tungsten filament light bulb instead of an LED light bulb, one which consumed the same amount of power as the LED light bulb. It would be fainter than the LED light bulb. Just like the star.

Since the light from the tungsten filament is generated by heating it, it behaves similarly to the star. One of the advantages of LEDs over tungsten filament is their lower power consumption for the same luminosity at visible wavelengths. The LED turns more of the power it consumes into visible light and stays cold, whereas the tungsten filament (and the star) generate light as a by-product of heat as they become "white hot", for a given power consumption.

In the video above the comparison between the LED light bulb and the star is the same as if, instead of a star, a giant tungsten filament bulb the size of a star had been placed at the same distance as the star.

Rob MacInnis could have achieved the same thing by taking two similarly sized and rated light bulbs, one tungsten filament and one LED, and holding them up next to each other.

Still, it is nice to climb a hill at night.

Monday, 4 April 2016

The parable of Einstein and the bean counters

Einstein offered a seminar one day
to describe the elaborate beauty of his calculations.
The bean counters came, having heard of the importance of this work.
They sat for a while, confused,

until Einstein said something that reminded them
of something they had once dealt with. Then they could interject
with complaints about irrelevant and trivial issues of basic arithmetic,
lecturing Einstein about tedious problems he was already familiar with,
which were solved long ago, and Einstein left
having been unable to conclude the exposition of a single point
due to interruptions, while the bean counters left

congratulating themselves on having set straight a cheap charlatan.

Lux aeterna

Part I: Aether

A pale light shines through the threadbare world,
a cold luminous presence over which the world rests like gauze,
a milky white light that lingers in the mist
and comes to rest in the dew drops that are threaded,
like pearls,
on a spider's web on a cold morning,
before it is wrecked by the ruinous chance
of a passing child’s exuberance.

It is a light denied.
We sense it with our eyes shut,
half asleep,
and it shyly recedes when we awaken
before we can notice it.

Does it illuminate our dreams?
Is it a residue of refraction that escapes explanation?
Certainly, no microscope finds it. It registers on no instrument.
It sits behind the light our eyes can see.
It blows through us in ghostly gusts,
leaves no imprint where we lay out film to make a record,
is not embroiled in our retinas, eludes the traps we lay for it,
slips through the net and avoids the snare of sense. 

I must disaggregate myself entirely to lure it into my grasp. 
I sink my cold, brine-filled lungs to the bottom of the sea.
I cast my eyes among the worn shingle orbs upon the shore.
I stack my weary bones where fences need mended,
let the wind spin my hair into bog-cotton,
let my breath escape into the clouds,

before it becomes truly crystal clear to me,
and I feel the light
and wander in stunned silence,
vanishing into the infinite mist of my trance,
a mist that brings me only the most distant and diffuse light,
drops light that adheres to anything recognisable to the ground like a stone,
and transmits only pure light free from the vulgarity of objects,
and I see beyond the dull diurnal description of things,
find them tedious, these rude intrusions that interrupt my ecstasy,
tripping me up with their misplaced urgency,
their insistence padding out our daily barter and trade,
dyes that stain our fingers as we thumb and rub
and try out the fabric of the world in the marketplace
with words drained of any colour
that can catch this infinite paleness
which confounds our trials and reckoning
with its ungovernable billowing,
always taken out of reach by gusts
from unseasonal siroccos.

Part II: the Moon

She is well known, meticulously described, thoroughly documented:
she shines with a reflected light; men have walked upon her;
she is an inert stone slung upon an orbit apples might share;
and so on.
But to my infinitely dispersed self she seems to shine
with another light that is not caught in that net of words,
a light that reveals this earth is just as cratered and lifeless
when seen beyond the scope of human sight, from our orbit
in the stark and barren brightness of the void, and all our follies,
our fret and fuss, our boasts and monuments, our footprints on the Moon
are ageless dust to which we have no real claim,
and the hopes and fears of those that made them mean nothing.

With every effort possible we try to trap the light: every stem of every quaver
and minim, every stroke of every pen committed by artist, poet or composer
every strut of logical scaffold with which our arguments are supported,
even every strip of lead in the stained glass windows of St Denis,
where the light blasted holes in the walls of old Romanesque Europe, every rib
of every vaulted space where thoughts dwell and find their compass
in the leisurely speculations of men pacing in dedication to knowledge,
is a bar in a cage we think we make to contain the light,
and we justify the trespass we attempt upon it with a promise
of a lantern in which the light peers through the bailing wire,
cradled in this Pharos with which we hope to show the way ahead,

as though we were lost,
as though we could ever be found,
as though we are anything more than passing eddies twisting in the ancient dust,

until eventually we discover that in fact the cage contains, not it, but us,
once we are released at last from the prison we make for ourselves,
and finally walk into the light.

Man mountain

We climbed upon my father's back
                when we were young,
                my brother and I,
                joined in mutual joy.

He was a world
                with which we wrestled
                secure in his indestructibility,

but as we grew
                his stature did not shrink,
diminish with age,
                and simplify by comparison with ours
                                but grew more strange.

Our ascent became an ordeal,
                the paths that laid our way to him
                overgrown and bifurcating,
                ending at last
                                in a tangle of paranoia
                               
and, once, the old man we met as adults
                explained himself
                                at the end: "I am happy,

for if you hated me,

it made you love your brother more"

Island

I am no man, though men climb on my back
and tangle in my teeth when ships are wrecked.
My shingle-stomached bays have hugged the keels
of lymphads long ago. My tall sea cliffs,

whose ramparts lie concealed in cloud and mist
deep-pierced and bristling with the loud complaint
of gulls, receive the sea's ceaseless assault,
ridden by intrepidity of men. And yet,

I remain un-won. I am what stays
when all of what once was is washed away.

sister sea, o sister sea,
o please bring no more men to me.
sister sea, o sister sea,
o please bring no more men to me,

o sister sea

Ghosts

We have descended
from an ageless bliss.

There we were
instantly and innocently
revealed to each other,
clearly, at a glance,
with wordless immediacy,
known to each other
with constant unremarked intimacy,
imperturbable in our bright array
by each other's side
upon thrones of pure perfection.

It was sufficient for us to behold
and bear witness to each other,
for everything to be exposed
to our eyes' effortless regard
and accepted by our heart's
infinite tenderness,
and when we walked
it was in temples and palaces
and when we talked
it was of the miracle of a world
constituted to make love possible,
a world made sense of
only by the rule of love,
a world where love without end
was the sum of all knowledge.

What we now consider knowledge
is merely the dim outline
of the all that has fallen into darkness
and is obscure in this era of our great forgetting,
whose duration cannot be reckoned
because we have forgotten when it started,
                                                     
for we have come down to this place,
here, now, where we slowly, inevitably,
ruin each other's lives
with each inept encounter:

every utterance an inadvertent insult
ricocheting loudly off target,
words cheapened by the trade
and tedious barter of their meanings,
to become mere implements to brandish,
branches and broken things waved
in a futile ape-show of aggression,
as we condescend to describe each other
only in terms of what we want,
congratulating ourselves
for our sophisticated insinuations,
the limited yet elaborate scope,
and precise clarifications of our display;

or the means to beat the drum
so that we can pace and shuffle
through the rituals with which we mark
the interval of time and space
to which we are now heir in this place,
tethered to the illusions of a flesh
that we use to trespass upon each other,
that we clutch and fumble as an escape
rather than as a celebration,
                                           
and afterwards we part
and wander the streets
alone like mute ghosts,
no longer able
even to summon the meagre effort
for a pretence of communication,
and the world is a wind
that passes through us,
leaving us cold and empty
in our exhaustion and vagrancy,
attenuated and aimless,
beneath the slow captive orbit
of the white stone eye of night,
an eye which indifferently observes us,
clouded and pale with a blindness
that balances everywhere and nowhere
in the dim crepescular equivalence of all things.
Where once there were temples and palaces
we walk among the wreckage
of our failed imagination,

but one of us
finds a forgotten tarnished crown
rattling in a gutter,
another some scattered pearls 
strung together once again
along discarded sinew of some carrion,
a third a rank rotting ermine robe
rescued from emboldened rats
who once called it home.
We wear our garments.
We raise temples in the clouds
and build our palace on the moon
and now, at least,
are able to bear the sight of each other
once again,
arrayed in undisguised dilapidation,
to conceal what we have become.



Friday, 1 April 2016

Of Silk and Steel

Tensile yield strength of structural ASTM A36 steel: 250 MPa
Tensile yield strength of silkworm silk: 500 MPa

If Wales had a direct relationship with Europe as an independent country, rather than relying on the intercession of Westminster, would its steel industry now be facing extinction with the closure of Port Talbot?

The context for this question is the fact that Westminster represents first and foremost the interests of the City of London in any discussions. The City has very little interest in the Welsh steel industry. However it has a keen interest in securing a role as the principal financial centre in Europe for investments and transactions related to the "New Silk Road" project.

The New Silk Road is a Chinese initiative announced in 2013 which aims to promote trade along land and maritime corridors from China to Europe. Close to one trillion dollars is due to be invested in infrastructure to support these routes which will transmit up to one third of global GDP. New Chinese cities, each with inhabitants as numerous as the entire population of Wales, are being developed around manufacturing, warehousing and logistics facilities associated with developments along this trade route. One of the key objectives of the New Silk Road is the export of Chinese over-capacity in areas such as steel production.

And that is where the fate of Port Talbot comes in. Westminster has routinely acted to appease the Chinese in order to protect the status of the City. For example, many government decisions related to the proposed Hinkley C nuclear power plant only make sense in the context of how this is being financed by the Chinese. And Westminster has blocked European efforts to protect the steel industry from cheap Chinese imports for similar reasons.

The interests of the City override all other considerations and distort UK Government policy until it is unrecognisable as a sensible response to circumstances arising anywhere else in the country. The relationship between elites in London and Beijing takes precedence over the relationship between the government and the people on whose behalf they are supposed to act.

And as globalisation enhances one set of 21st Century connections between a constellation of democratically unaccountable global financial centres, it disconnects the rest of us and leaves us in medieval darkness.