Thursday, 26 May 2016

Poetry Slouch

I don't want to slam
my poetry: wham!
No bang! No thanks.
No thank you ma'am.
I want to slouch
on a couch in my house,
and read poems slow:
long poems, lights low,
with friends drinking booze
as we ponder our muse.
No scoring, no prize.
Or maybe outside
on warm lazy days
we'll lounge in the shade
without trying to grade
the poems we made,
and our motiveless mirth
will be aimless enough
to encompass the earth
and the stars and the moon
until, late or soon,
our ecstasies cease
as our cups' slow surfeit
sends us all off to sleep.

The Barber at the End of the Universe

You can't comb the hair on a hairy ball completely flat if the ball is completely hairy.

Not without having at least one hair go over another. If no hairs are allowed to cross over each other, you will always be left with a situation where at least one hair has to be left sticking up. You always need at least one tuft for the rest to lie flat.

This is called the "hairy ball" theorem. You can read more about it here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairy_ball_theorem

The theorem states that "there is no non-vanishing continuous tangent vector field on even-dimensional n-spheres." It is sometimes stated in the form "every cow must have at least one cowlick."

The key terms here are "even dimensional" and "continuous." 

Let's consider a simple odd dimensional case. A 1-sphere. A circle. 


You can easily imagine how to lie the "hairs" on the circle flat. As the hairs get shorter - as we give our circle a very close shave - these hairs tend towards being tangents. We don't need to leave one sticking up. Odd dimensions. 

Now let's consider even dimensions, but with a discontinuous tangent vector field. A simple example is you! Consider your head to be a sphere! 

You can comb your hair flat, in this strictly mathematical sense, because if we consider your hair to be the tangent vector field, we can see it is not continuous. You don't have hair entirely covering your head (probably). It stops somewhere. You have a fringe: a discontinuity in the tangent vector field represented by your hair. So you don't need a tuft.    

So what? 

Well, this theorem interests me because of something I wrote about earlier. I was discussing black holes here:

I found myself wondering why the number of microstates of a hypothetical "unit" black hole should be the sum of the volumes of all even dimensional unit n-spheres, rather than simply 1, which one might have intuitively assumed to be the answer. 

Maybe the hairy ball theorem is the answer. Maybe we have to consider the tangent vector field of the event horizon of the black hole over all dimensions when evaluating the number of microstates.  

Given the event horizon of a black hole is the edge of space, and a location one can only reach at the end of time, due to General Relativistic considerations, this reminds me of the great Douglas Adams' novel "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe". 

The "tuftiness" we see as information content - microstates - manifested as the surface area of that event horizon, can be thought of having been styled by "The Barber at the End of the Universe".  

Which leaves me wondering about the status of that famous black hole theorem, the "no hair" theorem:

Maybe in the sense I discuss above we must consider black holes to be hairy. 

And God is their barber. 


Wednesday, 11 May 2016

Elevator Pitch 2: Transgender Space Jesus

(From the people who brought you Elevator Pitch)

It is the future.

A perfect utopian society exists.

But one girl knows she is different from everyone else.

After an awkward and embarrassing incident [TBD] others know too. She consents to medical examination. The results astound and confuse everyone.

Ostracised and alone, rejected, wandering lost and bewildered, she is eventually approached by an enigmatic individual who reveals the reason for her uniqueness.

She lives on a planet whose inhabitants have no concept of gender.

Everyone is female from a reproductive point of view. Maleness has been eliminated. People are born with a full complement of ovums which are self-fertilised to allow procreation once maturity is reached without male input. Everyone is identical to their mother and sisters, nieces and daughters, differing only in age.

However the girl is a mutant.

A chromosomal abnormality has resulted in physical defects and behavioural difficulties. The enigmatic stranger explains that this deviance corresponds to a situation that is known in other societies, and is a throwback to the way things once were before the founders of their society established the basis for the equilibrium and tranquillity they enjoy, the peace which she has now disturbed.

In a time now considered prehistory a scientist developed a retrovirus to propagate his own genetic material through the entire population by hijacking the reproductive systems of every woman. This infection had resulted in self-fertilisation. Parthenogenesis of exclusively female offspring eliminated all men within a generation.

Now a flaw in the virus has resulted in the girl being a throwback, chromosomally masculine, and developing the corresponding traits and physical features.

The girl is grateful for the explanation but unsure of her feelings or what to do next.

The stranger then makes an offer.

The stranger explains that she knows about this because she comes from a special organisation that exists in secret within their otherwise utterly undifferentiated and perfect society. This organisation acts as liaison with similar organisations in other societies on other planets to co-ordinate the preservation of the galactic ecosystem. This has given her access to information about the past of their own society and the existence of other societies, knowledge from which the general population are protected.

The girl's abnormalities mean she is uniquely qualified for an urgent mission that has arisen. They are the only planet close enough to intervene and save another from destruction, and because of her mutation she is the only person with the experience and understanding to enable her to be sent to change the course of that society's actions before they lead to disaster.

The society on the other planet has an emphatically binary concept of gender.

The other planet is Earth.

It is evident that the way the people on Earth are exploiting their planet and each other will result in catastrophe, and they need to be taught a new way of living to prevent this.

The girl is brought to a remote location where she boards a space vessel and embarks for Earth.

Once on Earth she reveals herself to a few individuals who she tries to teach, who can then in turn teach others. She preaches a message of love, of abandoning destructive materialistic goals, of considering more sustainable achievements and rewards based on a more spiritual awareness of reality.

Her followers become intrigued by her virgin birth. Her scientific and technological knowledge is so advanced they find it indistinguishable from magic. They interpret many of her acts as miracles and misconstrue their intention.

The mission starts to go wrong and she decides to act directly, attacking a primitive system of valuation and exchange that imposes limits on their ability to think about the issues she wants to discuss. She throws some of its most prominent practitioners out of a particularly high profile building where they have taken up residence.

This antagonises some sections of society and her death is sanctioned. She is nailed to a tree.

Before returning to her own planet she promises to come back one day.

After reaching home and recovering from her adventures she encounters a young niece unusually curious about her absence, what new experiences she had, and what she can learn from them.

Eventually the niece confides in her. The niece is worried she is not like other people.

She smiles.

Snog me lots


(After Catullus)

Kiss me once, kiss me twice, 
kiss me here, it's very nice,
snog me lots, snog me more, 
wash me up on love's lost shore,
counting kisses like grains of sand,
spilling from your gentle hands,
spread your kisses like they're atoms
sink them where the coral is vivid
deeper than jealousy can fathom
confound the reckoning of the wicked

(So let us live and love, my Lesbia,
and reckon all the smug, self-satisfied, snivelling, 
senile snipes and gripes of gossip gathering about us
at less than a farthing! 
                                     The Sun dies and can return,
like a glittering coin tossed a thousand times. 
To us is given just a single brief glimpse of light 
before we must turn our face away, 
and be cast into perpetual night. 

So give me a thousand kisses, and then give me a hundred
and then another thousand, and then a second hundred
and then yet another thousand, even then another hundred.
And then, 
              then, 
                     only then, 
                             once we have shared so very, 
                                           very many thousands of kisses
Bin the count! 
                      So that even we don’t know how many there are
And then no-one else can try to defend their ill-will towards us
by knowing the extent of the incalculable, scandalous wealth of our kisses.

Vivamus, mea Lesbia, atque amemus,
rumoresque senum severiorum
omnes unius aestimemus assis!
soles occidere et redire possunt;
nobis, cum semel occidit brevis lux,
nox est perpetua una dormienda.
da mi basia mille, deinde centum,
dein mille altera, dein secunda centum,
deinde usque altera mille, deinde centum;
dein, cum milia multa fecerimus,
conturbabimus illa, ne sciamus,
aut ne quis malus invidere possit
cum tantum sciat esse basiorum.)

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

The capercaillie and the egg

At the outset I should make clear I am not actually going to say anything about capercaillies.

I was just contriving a suitably scotticised variant of the old chicken-and-egg paradigm as a way of describing the situation the Yes Movement finds itself in after the election last Thursday.

What comes first:

  • Independence, which may then subsequently provide a platform to promote progressive or left wing ideas structurally marginalised in wider British politics, or 
  • The advocacy of those ideas themselves, with self-determination relegated to being one among many ideas rather than as a prior condition for achieving them?

Supporters of Independence in the Yes Movement have included members of both camps. This worked fine during a referendum campaign which didn't pit them against each other. Not so well during an election campaign that did.

A certain amount of recrimination continues in relation to the outcome of the second vote last Thursday and accusations that tactical voting on the list would have either maximised pro-indy representation in parliament or preserved the SNP majority, being mutually exclusive outcomes each of which is desirable for various reasons.

  • On the one hand there are those who still assert the SNP would have preserved its majority if only people had acted in the way they said, while 
  • On the other there are those who continue to object to various atrocities of electoral arithmetic that saw left wing ideas cast aside and stronger pro-indy representation sacrificed. 

I made my own opinion abundantly clear on the morning of the election and on many previous occasions. But now we are in a reality altered by the outcome of that election. And the truth is no-one had a crystal ball prior to the count and we cannot castigate anyone on either side of the debate on the basis of the outcome. If continued discussion of the issue does not seem likely to yield a positive learning outcome for everyone concerned then I suggest we move on.

And there are many other good reasons to stop bickering about the second vote and many other things to be getting on with:

We need to talk about Labour

Labour in Scotland continue to peddle myths about devomax / federalism / home rule / whatever it's called this week. But they already sold us that carpet, even if they didn't deliver it. Some attention should be given to pointing this out to them, and gently nudging them further towards the disavowal of "The Vow" that remains unavoidable if they have ambitions of ever being taken seriously again. Deprive them of the straws they are clutching so they can finally embrace reality.

Rule Ruthania, Ruthania Rules the Airwaves

The inherent contradictions of almost every Tory position are now thrust into a new prominence as a result of the media taking every opportunity to declare Ruth the winner of the election (actual facts notwithstanding). This means it should be (even more) straightforward to mercilessly and forensically dismantle them, now that they are exposed to light and scrutiny as never before.

The wolf has shed his sheepskin. 

It is a few years now since we lost our innocence in relation to the conduct of the mainstream media, and the BBC in particular.

Now the outcome of the election means that the BBC can abandon the temporary convenience of its alliance with Labour in Scotland and revert to a position it is more comfortable and familiar with, and which it can now adopt consistently across the entire network: promoting a Tory UK establishment agenda. All bonds of blood and marriage, all midnight oaths of eternal fealty solemnly sworn on unsheathed steel beneath a waxing moon between Labour and the BBC in Scotland are forgotten in the blink of an eye now that the relative success of Ruth Davidson gives the network another stick with which to beat Jeremy Corbyn.

We have fewer popular illusions and deceptions to contend with.

And now the BBC, Ruth Davidson, David Cameron and the UK establishment are lined up like bowling pins for one single resounding strike.

"All politics is local"

In May 2017 the local government election will be contested in Scotland.

I have written at length previously about how we must encourage our democratic pluralism in order to ensure it is prepared and mature by the time the first election in an Independent Scotland is contested, while at the same time preserve a unity of vision and purpose regarding Independence to secure the circumstances of that election. The forthcoming local elections provide an excellent opportunity for those who share a commitment to Independence but have different visions of what that means to develop their positions without damaging the cause.

In a sense it is not fair to expect recently formed parties that emerged from the Yes Movement to contest a national election such as the one we just held with any great degree of success. Big parties succeed in big elections. But these big parties started off life as small parties and built their organisation and appeal quietly and effectively over many decades dealing at first with local issues.

Electoral success is directly correlated with the perceived relevance of policies to the daily lives of the electorate. A campaign based on genuinely listening to people's concerns on the doorstep and developing realistic local solutions can overcome disadvantages conferred by even the most adverse perception of a party nationally.

I propose that 2017 is the year RISE and the rest pay their dues, use the local elections to make themselves genuinely useful, and mature into the parties we want and need them to be by the time Independence arrives.

Faith

Is the world spread with sparkling miracles
replete with depth and meaning and purpose,
or do the depths of every gem hide more facets,
each miracle setting a horizon on a superficial world?

Is love a mystery full of surprise and novelty
as fresh joy and fulfilment excite us
with each celebration of our lover's mind and body,
or are its yearnings a punishment, and the only mystery
the nature of the crime for which it is suffered?

Does every flower draw on hidden roots
which find their way in secret through more than earth
but also imagination, where every hue that tints its petals
is ultimately mined, or is the earth divided
by membranes across which only nutrients pass?

Do questions spiral and bifurcate in infinite space
into endless realms of possibility, or must enquiry halt
at the limits of a world that confines us? And if it must,
how can we bear witness to a child's tears,
and console her, and try to ease her pain
in a world we suppose incapable of cruelty?

There is no escape from sin with nothing to believe in,
and even if God resides only in the laughter of a child,
or an unexpected kindness, or the smile of our beloved,
we are saved from the inevitabilities within us.

Saturday, 7 May 2016

The time being

They say life is difficult.
We don't understand each other
and as a consequence
everything is unfair 
in this zone we cohabit,
mapped by our mistakes,
every grid reference a cross-purpose,
pushing and pulling us to and fro
despite our best intentions,
sometimes to hilarious,
sometimes frustrating effect.
But life is not a choice 
between fair and unfair:
if we understood each other perfectly
life would be impossible
because no-one actually lives in heaven,
that's not how heaven works, or life.
We depend on error 
and hope for the best
to survive here and now.
So, in the meantime,
come here and kiss me,
and be happy 
that we will have to wonder why
we love each other so much
for the time being.

Decision Time

The political landscape remains familiar in Scotland after Thursday's election, but is nevertheless fundamentally changed.

Labour in Scotland now have an identity crisis. They've lost their anti-indy credentials to the tories and any credibility they had on anything else to the SNP. It is no longer clear who they are or what they're for.

This leaves BBC Scotland with a terrible decision. Notwithstanding the many personal relationships between BBC staff in Scotland and the Labour party, which have blatantly compromised any impartiality they claimed for their reporting hitherto, the BBC are now confronted with a different standard bearer for the anti-indy cause in Ruth's tory retreads.

Do they dump their long term pals in Scottish Labour and throw their full support behind Ruth as the Union's last, best chance?

The palpable tumescence that has pervaded their reporting of the election outcome for the tories suggests yes. The Union trumps ties of blood and marriage: witness Sarah Smith's North Korean levels of hysteria when describing the tories triumph in coming ... second.

The BBC are showing their true colours. They are conspicuously more excited by the tories coming second than by the SNP winning a historic third term with a record share of the constituency vote and a record number of constituencies. We must not allow ourselves to be distracted by their biassed reporting from what is genuinely important.

But perhaps the biggest decision awaits Labour in Scotland, one that has been inevitable and unavoidable for a long time now, one which only petty entrenched tribalistic interests have prevented them from grappling with until now. Will they finally bite the bullet? Their delay in dealing with it until now has proved disasterous. They risk being crushed entirely by this elephant in the room. Any further delay risks utter annihilation.

They now no longer have the luxury of the various intermediate positions that were previously entertained as a viable compromise with their own ore intractable elements. They can only retain any credibility now if they vault completely any advocacy of a federal UK or a looser affiliation between the parties in Scotland and the rest of the UK.

Labour in Scotland now have to decide if they are going to be the Prodigal Party and come into the indy fold. It is now the only way they can be a credible choice in an Independent Scotland.

Friday, 6 May 2016

The fingerprint


Osip sang of his Kremlin man, his mountaineer
with a thick poking finger pointing the way ahead
for his menagerie of sycophantic porters. He wasn't alone.
All the world's capitals boast their climbers now,
wherever a flag can be flown in hate to claim a state,
and from the pinnacles of their mighty achievements,
from mountaintops remote and inaccessible to lesser men,
they seek to join hands with each other over our heads
as if holding a seance in which we are the spirits of the dead,
the anonymous ghosts of their future victims,
summoned and interrogated by democratic rituals
which they tell us are evidence of our consent,
then, having served our purpose, we are dismissed
to occupy the graves they have prepared for us
in accordance with the will of the people.

They reach out towards each other urgently,
strenuously exert themselves, stretch,
willing their fingertips on beyond physical limits,
each standing on tip-toe on the separate summit
of their individual boasts, their own conquests,
their unique struggles, their profound insights,
their paths to glory, their rags to riches tales,
all now aching to touch so badly, and join hands
and form their criminal club of vindicated outcasts
and misunderstood tyranny, invoking secret magic
as they extend their arms so far towards each other,
that their straining hands summon strange blossoms
emerging weirdly from beneath the ground, far below,
attracted by the broad magnetic palms of those mighty hands,
stems twisting and pushing up through the soil of the plain,
blossoms trailing smoky stems, tipped with smooth metal buds,
launched thrusting up towards the sky, piercing the sky,
pushing on towards to the stars,
and bringing all the stars back to earth with them when they fall.

And then I see they are not the only ones, these mountaineers:
the mountains they have ascended are themselves made of men,
not rock, their piled limbs greased and gleaming with sweat
as they struggle, climbing over each other to reach the top,
writhing like time lapse insects, or atoms in slow motion,
indistinguishable from each other
in the Brownian motion of their politics,
taking turns to establish themselves in temporary prominence,
occasional Pierrots in a carnival of constant overthrow,
while truth remains a beggar on the courthouse steps,

and the foaming crop of flowers carpeting the plain below
is suddenly formed now from a sea of strange bulbs of light.
The plain is frothing with little bubbles, rising, swelling,
then suddenly bulging like balloons inflating with blinding light,
bright bulging bitter fruit erupting and bursting open
on the branches of trees tossed and teased from tiny subatomic seeds
cultivated in a lab somewhere by tame toiling boffins,
buffoons hothoused in some sterile academic ego factory
insulated from each and every moral compass and consequence.

They do to humans what Pavlov wouldn't do to a dog,
performing tiny test tube apocalypses to a captive audience
that oscillates between rigid electrified attention
and slouching in exhausted and indifferent amnesia
at the flick of a Milgram switch, secretly installed
in every miraculous, mesmeric handheld device they carry
to mediate, filter and attenuate their ration of cruel reality
with an illusion of benign rationality
that makes it bearable to the infantilised mob
and facilitate the silent automated applause
of a thousand strangers' thumb-jerk response
once the final performance is unveiled
and we are our brother's keeper
only in the sense
Zimbardo meant in Stanford Prison,
only in the sense
that we are all just preened and painted comfort women
draped as decorative and distracting embellishments
on the arms of disposable cannon fodder men
marching until it is as if they never existed,
only in the condemned and uncommon sense
that makes no sense and makes everyone wrong,
and there is nothing worth fighting for anymore.

And then I see it is not love that moves these mountaineers,
not love that compels them to reach for each other
as the ripe bright blooms of light on stems of dust rise
from soil rich with our own powdered and anonymous bones:
the mountaineers reach towards each other across this wide world
not to join hands or embrace, but to take each other by the throat
and as they extend their hands they reap their crop of hate,
their stroboscopic harvest, their uranium bouquet,
and woo each other with a darkening romance
recited on tongues of ash among the fallout.

But neither is their hate sincere
for they know nothing about each other.
They ascend interior peaks on which no suns rise,
in a primordial solitude of fear and guilt and transformation,
a private Shasta and Kailash and Schiehallion in the mountains
that range secretly along the ridges of the secretions
in their own fingerprint
where with lonely heroic struggle they overcome doubt,
shut traumas that stunted their development away in caves,
defeat fantasy demons instead,
and find the severe conviction necessary
to usher into this world their internal night,
their verklärte nacht, and at last
the hands unjoin, the outstretched arms fall,
the fingers descend on the button
and imprint upon it the map of their derangement
with residues of endocrine secretion,
and the missiles are launched
and the fingerprint remains on the button,
for a few minutes at least,
standing as brief testimony of an individual presence
before it evaporates in the white anonymising heat
of an artificial sun.




Thursday, 5 May 2016

I will be voting SNP with both votes today because ...

I will be voting SNP with both votes today because "food banks are not part of the welfare state, they are symbol that the welfare state is failing" (Mhairi Black, maiden speech)

(http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/mhairi-black-speech-in-full-snp-mp-tears-apart-conservative-government-and-labour-opposition-in-10389334.html)

I will be voting SNP with both votes today because "the Scottish National Party is resolutely opposed to renewing [Trident]"

(http://www.theweek.co.uk/52318/pros-and-cons-of-trident-snp-piles-pressure-on-labour)

I will be voting SNP with both votes today because  "two Lanarkshire steel mills have been saved from closure [...] in a deal brokered by the Scottish government"

(https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/mar/24/tata-scottish-steel-works-rescued-by-liberty-house).

I will be voting SNP with both votes today because "the Treasury [...] endangered £7 billion of public funding in Scotland [and] we are indebted to Scotland’s Finance Secretary, John Swinney, and to First Minister Nicola Sturgeon for securing a no-detriment deal for Scotland"

(http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmhansrd/cm160224/debtext/160224-0001.htm)

I will be voting SNP with both votes today because nothing would cause the Tories in Westminster more dismay than a second SNP majority, and nothing would delight them more than if the SNP were to lose that majority.

During the referendum campaign the No side often made reference to "solidarity between the workers of Leith and the workers of Liverpool". Yet when the Hillsborough verdict was delivered that solidarity was most in evidence among veterans of the Yes campaign, while embittered unionists like Muriel Gray attempted shamelessly to spin it as an "SNP Bad" story.

When online misogyny needed to be challenged, and when rape-apologists like Roosh V and his cohorts needed to be kept off our streets, it was veterans of the Yes campaign that rallied in solidarity with our mothers, sisters and daughters, while the unionists merely closed ranks to protect misogynists like Brian Spanner.

It would seem unionist solidarity only extends as far as the absolution of any crime as long as inveterate hatred of the SNP is maintained. When they say solidarity they are merely referring to a sort of siege mentality.  

Independence is about solidarity too. But it is a different kind of solidarity. We stand in solidarity with 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees fleeing violence abroad which is thwarted while the UK controls our borders and serves the interests of the arms dealers that provide the bombs that fall on them. Our solidarity extends from Leith to Liverpool and beyond to Syria and Somalia and everywhere our humanitarian intentions are hindered by UK Government policy. Independence is our chance to embrace the world.

Scotland is in a transitional state. We are enduring the birth pangs of Independence, as I have observed elsewhere. We are all midwives of our shared future, and all the varied choices we wish our offspring to enjoy rely on a single united and concerted effort just now.

Only giving both votes to the SNP will secure a majority at Holyrood.